Marketing Innovation Strategy and Entrepreneurial Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Nakuru East Town Sub-County

  • Susan Major Okundi
  • Anne Wambui Muchemi
Keywords: Marketing Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs))

Abstract

The economic development of a country is determined by various key roles played by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). They contribute approximately 40 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and create 80 percent of jobs. However, SMEs have been facing performance challenges which threaten their sustainability based on entrepreneurial abilities. Therefore, it is in the interest of the Kenyan government, organizational philosophers, managers and equally entrepreneurs who have long shown more interest in innovation in SMEs, predominantly due to the vital role innovation plays in safeguarding sustained competitive gain. In consequence of the increase in competition levels, it is therefore necessary to identify appropriate innovation strategies that would make their product and services competitive in the market in which they operate in. Thus, this study’s objective was to define and determine the effect of marketing innovation strategy and entrepreneurial performance of SMEs in Nakuru East Town Sub-County, Kenya. This study’s specific objective was the effect of Marketing Innovation Strategy on entrepreneurial performance of selected SMEs in Nakuru East Town Sub-County, Kenya. It is in this context that Nakuru East Town Sub-County was targeted because of the high rate of SMEs decline in the area and the variability in the entrepreneurial nature of 1,259 SMEs that have single business permits operating in the area including: wholesalers and retailers, fishmongers, salons and barbershops, cybercafés, hotels and cafes, construction, and hardware stores. The study engaged a descriptive and explanatory research design that targeted 126 respondents who are 10 percent of the selected registered 1,259 SMEs in Nakuru East Town Sub-County. A questionnaire which had open and close ended questions was adopted in this study. The questionnaire was administered using drop-and-pick later methods for some, and for others the researcher herself used an interview schedule. The respondents of the study were the owner or the in-charge/manager of the SME. The questionnaire was piloted to determine validity and to establish whether the questions will measure the expected theorized variables. According to the findings, all of the items' Cronbach's Alpha values were greater than 0.7. this indicated that that the questionnaires used to collect the data were reliable. The data collected was quantitative and was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. According to the findings, there is a strong positive and significant relationship between marketing innovation strategy and entrepreneurial performance of SMEs in Nakuru East Town Sub-County. Based on these conclusions, the study suggests and recommends that SMEs business owners should consider improving product design, introduce new distribution channels, find new markets for their products and change their advertising methods. These will lead to growth in the market share, customer satisfaction, profitability and efficiency. 

 

Author Biographies

Susan Major Okundi

MBA Student, School of Business, Kenyatta University, Kenya

Anne Wambui Muchemi

Lecturer, Department of Business Administration, Kenyatta University, Kenya

References

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 32(1), 15-30.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757-774.

Agarwal, Rajshree, David B. Audretsch & M.B. Sarkar (2008). Process of Creative Construction: Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 263-286.

Alvarez, S.A. & Barney, J.B. (2008). Opportunities, organizations, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 171–173.

Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349–359.

Arshad, A. S., Rasli, A., Arshad, A. A., & Zain, Z. M. (2014). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on business performance: A study of technology-based SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 130(2014), 46-53

Aslamydai, M. J., Alnawas, I. A. M., & Yousif, R. A. (2010). The impact of marketing innovation on creating sustainable competitive advantage: The private commercial banks in Jordan. Asian Journal of Marketing, 4, 113–130.

Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 75(3), 226-235.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.006

Chen, Y. (2006). Marketing innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(1), 101-123

Companys, Y.E. & McMullan, J.S. (2006). Strategic entrepreneurs at work: The nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 301–322.

Corbett, A.C. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 97–118

Dibb, S., Simões, C., & Wensley, R. (2014). Establishing the scope of marketing practice: insights from practitioners. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 380–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-04-2011-0212

Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2011). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1454-1477

Elci, L & Karatayh, S (2009). Innovation Technopolis, Turkey, Ankara

Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1),1- 18.

Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance, International Journal of production economics, 133(2), 662-676.

Gupta, S., Malhotra, N. K., Czinkota, M., & Foroudi, P. (2016). Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69(12),5671–5681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.042

Haiyang Li and Kwaku Atuahene-Gima (2001), Product Innovation Strategy and The Performance of New Technology Ventures in China. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 6 (Dec., 2001), pp. 1123-1134.

Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2014). Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 35, 29-43.

Karabulut, A. T. (2015). Effects of innovation types on performance of manufacturing firms in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 195, 1355–1364

Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.

Kirzsner, I. M. (2000), Rationality, Entrepreneurship and Economic Imperialism. The Driving Force of the Market . New York. Routledge, 258-271

Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36-60.

Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. (2009). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.

Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J. T. & Ozsomer, A. (2002). The Effects of entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance. Journal of Marketing 66 (3), 18-32.

Mckeown, M. (2008), The Truth About Innovation. Pearson / Financial TiSMEs.

OECD (2005). Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris.

Pak T. N. (2012). The quest for innovation and entrepreneurship in Singapore: strategies and challenges. Globalisation, Societies and Education 10, 337-349

Rocha, E. A. G. (2012). The impact of business environment on small and medium enterprise sector’s size and employment: A cross country comparison. In International Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises Development Bali (14-16).

Salim, I. M., & Sulaiman, M. Bin. (2011). Impact of Organizational Innovation on Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian-Based ICT Companies. Business and Management Review, 1(5), 11. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1906131

Samuelides, A. H. E. (2001). Innovation’s dynamics in mobile phone services in France. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 153–163.

Sok, P., O’Cass, A., & Sok, K. M. (2013). Achieving superior SME performance: Overarching role of marketing, innovation, and learning capabilities. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2013.04.001

Suhag, A. Karim, Solangi, S. R., Larik, R. S. A., Lakho, M. K., & Tagar, A. H. (2017). The relationship of innovation with organizational performance. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.345736.

Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202-216.

Will Kenton, 2019. Corporate Finance & Accounting: Financial Analysis – How to Value a Company. Investopedia

Published
2022-06-19
How to Cite
Okundi, S., & Muchemi, A. (2022). Marketing Innovation Strategy and Entrepreneurial Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Nakuru East Town Sub-County. International Journal of Business Management, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(2), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.35942/jbmed.v4i2.261